CalPERSf pension rules would OK 99 types of extra pay to count toward pensions
By Jon Ortiz
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014 - 12:00 am - The Sacramento Bee
More than a year after Gov. Jerry Brown signed a law he said would
tamp down pension spiking, the statefs biggest public pension fund is on the
verge of adopting rules critics say would undermine its intent.
Staff at the California Public Employeesf Retirement System has suggested
that the fundfs board authorize 99 types of special payments as counting toward
pension calculations for employees hired since Brownfs pension law took effect
on Jan. 1, 2013. Among them: longevity pay, police marksmanship certification
pay, physical fitness pay, smog inspector license pay, notary pay, cement
finisher pay and holiday pay.
Public pension-change advocates, including Democratic San Jose Mayor Chuck
Reed, say the proposal is another sign that the union-dominated CalPERS board
gis doing what they can to resist reforms. c Theyfre in favor of
anything that expands benefits.h
But CalPERS says the proposal is consistent with the law and gives
much-needed clarity to the 3,100 school districts and state and local
governments in the retirement system who need to know what to report to the
fund.
The proposal up for discussion Tuesday and a vote by the CalPERS board on
Wednesday isnft political, fund spokesman Brad Pacheco said in an emailed
statement to The Bee.
gWe administer the pension system based on what was written in the law and
not on what others wish had been written,h Pacheco said.
When Brown signed the public pension law in 2012, he said it would limit
pension spiking and chip away at the soaring cost of government retirement
benefits, in part by ending the practice of boosting gpensionableh income with
supplements to base pay.
To date, Brown has publicly objected to only one item on the additional pay
list, a category allowing gtemporary upgrade payh to count toward pensions.
Temporary upgrades occur, for example, when an employee fills in for a superior
who has to take sudden leave. The promoted employee receives the absent bossfs
level of pay while in the acting role. CalPERS is proposing to count that extra
income toward pensions.
After CalPERS announced it would take up the proposal this week after giving
the public several weeks to write support and opposition letters, the governor
sent a brief letter of his own to CalPERS President Rob Feckner on Friday. Brown
urged the board to reconsider including temporary-promotion income in pension
calculations.
gThis disregards the rule that pensions will be based on normal monthly pay
and not on short-term, ad hoc pay increases,h Brown wrote.
CalPERS does not have a cost estimate of how much employersf pensions cost
might rise from adding the various pay categories to newer employeesf
pensionable income, or how much more workers or their employers would have to
contribute to the fund.
Action by CalPERS would not affect employees hired before the law took
effect, who already were able to count supplemental pay toward their pensions.
Elk Grove City Manager Laura Gill said including temporary upgrade pay
greally does invite spikingh and threatens to erode savings from pension changes
the Sacramento suburb has enacted the past couple of years, such as city
employees paying their share of pension costs.
She envisioned a scheme where an employee late in his or her career would
find a temporary assignment and earn between 5 percent and 10 percent more
salary for six months to a year. Upon retirement, the boost would then ripple
into the employeesf pensionable salary calculation.
If such practices became standard, git would put us backward from all the
work wefve done to have a sustainable and sound pension system,h Gill said.
But Mike Durant, president of the union-backed Peace Officers Research
Association of California, dismissed those kinds of concerns. If a city or the
state needs pension relief, he said, gthey can bargain it.h
Instead, he said, government employers expect CalPERS to save them from
themselves.
gThey want to put it on the backs of someone else to make those decisions
rather than making it themselves,h he said.
CalPERS administers pension benefits and investments for about 1.6 million
members. In fiscal 2012-13 it took in $3.9 billion in contributions from
employees and $8.1 billion from employers. Its assets are approaching $300
billion.
But it is still recovering from deep losses six years ago while confronting a
growing number of retirees who are living longer. As a result, the fund has
announced it is raising rates on employers over the next several years, in some
cases squeezing local and school district budgets.
Despite those concerns, Brownfs letter to CalPERS did not mention the other
98 items on the pensionable compensation list.
When asked whether the governor supported everything except the proposal to
recognize temporary upgrade pay, Brown spokesman Jim Evans said, gI think the
letter is pretty clear on what the governor opposes.h
CalPERS has taken the letter as a clear signal that temporary pay is Brownfs
only objection to the proposal.
gWe appreciate that Governor Brown recognized that CalPERS proposed
regulations are essentially consistent with the purposes of the Pension Reform
Act,h fund spokesman Pacheco said.